banimod / etpro / ettv forums

no the point DG is trying to make, is its better not to advertise to the world and his dog how we detect, as if the cheats know how we detect, they can change. true, but it's better to share this knowledge to as many admins as possible, than to detect it on maybe five servers and let the cheaters p...

so what? better not fight them?
it's always a race between server admins, mod developers, evenbalance on the one side and cheat developers on the other side. but they're heavily outnumbered.

indeed. just forcing nc_wall and nc_fov to 0 would make the hack completly useless. well.. some other cvars should be set to 0 also, but i don't know which ones.

where to implement this settings? server.cfg?
@daemord all the cvars i mentioned are used by hack-users only.

you guys may allready know it: there's a new multihack in town. etpro 3.1.0 detects it as STRANGE WIN32, punkbuster doesn't (but will as soon as the new update is avaible) acoording to bani, updated versions of etpro anticheat will kick clients using it in the future. by the way, here's the answer t...

are there any videos which may spoil the new features to the public?
can't wait to playtest the new version. =)

ammo-management is kind of a skill. if you'd implement such a feature, it would go into the same direction as implementing an aimbot. (yeah, i know, bad example)

nice idea. wouldn't influence gameplay very much and encourage teamplay.
even me (look at my signature) has no argument against it.

hi there! since etpro-anticheat, all of us know the evenbalance guys are not the only ones busting punks. 8) i'd like to help anticheat becoming even more effective. so here's my question: does the etpro team need any demos of cheaters or links to bot-websites? i know, theres the cheat-forum here. b...

two holds (neither clan a nor clan b is able to get the objective done) don't happen very often.
even the match dignitas vs. d.sky (as seen in et.exposed) didn't result in a fullhold.

nope, my comment on nazis was a joke, just like ice_blasts comment. to argue against an order not to use cs as an argument by using cs as an argument is just the same as argueing against an order refering not to mention hitler ot the nazis by mentioning hitler or the nazis. ;) woah.. weird syntax. h...

bind x "weaponbank 1"

B4tt3rY wrote:and LoZz is only saying stupid things, cause he is 24/7 rifle nader

oh yeah, that's a good point, buddy.

what does bani stop from mapping gr2 or oasis2? nothing! apart from his power-abusing manner.

As any thread discussing changes to ET grows longer, the probability of a comparison between the proposed changes and Counterstrike approaches one.

seems to be your sore point, hmm?
any form of censorship is not healthy for discussions and reveals a nazi-like manner.

before crying for something, ask yourself this question: will it contribute to better gameplay? you also should worry about the consequence, which is: fieldops will be able to spam even more! did you noticed the words "even more"? yes? these words lead me to another fact: there is too much...