banimod / etpro / ettv forums

gotenks=> No.. i love the work that Bani implemented in ETpro its realy fantastic... Im asking 4 a cvar option... thats it..and thats all... //particulars... -Yes i plan 2 setup the server so that all eye candy must be turned on... --include forced cvars 4 all connection cvars... ---even a Fov resti...

Deej:=> Think im still banned... but thanx 4 asking.. //Off topic.... if u like fun go :) http://lillebror.justgotowned.com or get a demo from http://www.siksak.dk (Recorded with g_maxwarp 1 set on server, with (not sure) com_maxfps at 125 1 value cvars only 4 DSL) Again im asking 4 a cvar option. I...

WeblionX:=> I was under the impression that ETpro is built around sv_fps set at 20 ? reyalp:=> ? placebo effect ? Well i have seen (ETpub's) g_maxwarp 1 in "Action"... and i Believe that the ETpro team are all highly skilled programmers...so im thinking EFFECT...not placeboeffect. Boco:=> ...

gotenks:=> soory.. ur not "getting" the point... OPTIONal cvar.. im asking 4. Result-----------> IF a client cannot deliver 100 FPS at 0% "packetloss" at no "choke" and near perfect timedelta delivery.... GO play on a OTHER server where the CVAR isnt set.... Old cvar di...

gotenks:=> no... i like 2 setup a server 4 clients with 0% packetdrop that can hold 100 FPS... something like: cl_maxpackets 100 at com_maxfps 100 forced.. point: the old "antilag" "punished" not delivering packets.... and that is the option i would like..... Goal: 100% laggfree ...

//old antiwarp b_allowlandminehax (ETpro 3.0.0) bugfix: new anti-lagcheat code (b_antiwarp 1, default) handles genuinely laggy players better. b_allowlandminehax removed in favor of this new code Dear Mr.Bani Is it possible 2 get the "hard on laggers" type antiwarp back as a cvar option in...