ways to support troops

=SWAT=Kenny · Post by **=SWAT=Kenny** » Mon Mar 24, 2003 10:13 am

rex made this post on our boards. it is super helpful. if u follow the link you are not obligated to support the war. it has info so that you may support those overseas.

http://lad.goodnet.com/~swat/forums/viewtopic.php?t=841

********************
edit i had to update the link because people were also commenting on the war. so now i have a seperate link above just for the support the troops.

CorpseGrinder · Post by **CorpseGrinder** » Mon Mar 24, 2003 11:06 am

Good post Kenny, If you don't mind I'll post it in our forums also.
Those of us that are prior service know how it feels to be so far from home for such a long time and anything that they hear or get from us is a nice taste of home.

Solid Fett · Post by **Solid Fett** » Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:23 pm

omg! speakin of the war, did u hear about the guy who threw a grenade into his own tent and killed his men! hahaha! now thats comedy, war baby! yeehaw!

Gyro Gearloose · Post by **Gyro Gearloose** » Mon Mar 24, 2003 2:55 pm

That's called "fragging" - it happened occasionally in Viet Nam. The same as in this case, mostly it was soldiers fragging officers!

I-M nUbee · Post by **I-M nUbee** » Mon Mar 24, 2003 8:29 pm

Solid Fett wrote:omg! speakin of the war, did u hear about the guy who threw a grenade into his own tent and killed his men! hahaha! now thats comedy, war baby! yeehaw!

Even though you may be joking, That IS NOT COMEDY!!! you are one sick little boy.

GanjMahal · Post by **GanjMahal** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:56 am

This war makes me sick.

gotenks · Post by **gotenks** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 10:59 am

i don't agree with the war but i support our troops, they don't exactly have an option

The Big Bad Cow · Post by **The Big Bad Cow** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 12:13 pm

Im with Gotenks... I hate this war too, but there is nothing those soldiers can do about it.

And solid fett, you are sick.

duke'ku · Post by **duke'ku** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 12:16 pm

War = bad. But we need to support troops.

RedNeck · Post by **RedNeck** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 5:27 pm

Well we need to go to war with Iraq. I dont feel like living in a mountain for the rest of my life because of radiation or chemical wepons and thats if I even survive a strike. As america its are duty to protect the world. Plus Germany doesnt like war because of there past, not because they think we are wrong. /vsay GO AMERICA WOOHOO!

gotenks · Post by **gotenks** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 5:43 pm

-removed due to offense to author-

CorpseGrinder · Post by **CorpseGrinder** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 5:57 pm

gotenks wrote:i think that it'd be a very long time before they got nukes, now biological warfare may be another story, but the whole world is against this war, well except Bush's lapdog in brittan... because there was no proof of any violations yet america said they had proof but refused to provide it. If we do find any chemical weapon stockpiles than this is semi-justified, but i don't think us here in america have the right to say who they can have as a leader, the un should have that right, but especially not bush. Now if we find chemical weapons we have the right to disarm him, and if he dies that way then so be it.

Whatever!!!

TEAMMATE-8163 · Post by **TEAMMATE-8163** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 6:10 pm

gotenks wrote:i think that it'd be a very long time before they got nukes, now biological warfare may be another story, but the whole world is against this war, well except Bush's lapdog in brittan... because there was no proof of any violations yet america said they had proof but refused to provide it. If we do find any chemical weapon stockpiles than this is semi-justified, but i don't think us here in america have the right to say who they can have as a leader, the un should have that right, but especially not bush. Now if we find chemical weapons we have the right to disarm him, and if he dies that way then so be it.

http://www.udpviper.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1124

boy i hope this doesnt turn into another 36 page debate....
the first few pages are nothing compared to what the mid-final pages hold. im pretty sure this thread will be remembered for quite some time.

any debate on the war in this forum would be absolutely pointless. too many people here dont know dick form ass about the situation.

=SWAT=Kenny · Post by **=SWAT=Kenny** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 6:23 pm

HELLO if you want to hijack a thread go steal one that isnt serious. look this is about supporting the troops not spewing your pinhead opinions about anything other then the troops. got it this is about troops. let me say it again this is about troops.

if you want to comment on the war go to udpviper and comment or start another god dam thread.

=SWAT=Kenny · Post by **=SWAT=Kenny** » Tue Mar 25, 2003 6:25 pm

gotenks wrote:i think that it'd be a very long time before they got nukes, now biological warfare may be another story, but the whole world is against this war, well except Bush's lapdog in brittan... because there was no proof of any violations yet america said they had proof but refused to provide it. If we do find any chemical weapon stockpiles than this is semi-justified, but i don't think us here in america have the right to say who they can have as a leader, the un should have that right, but especially not bush. Now if we find chemical weapons we have the right to disarm him, and if he dies that way then so be it.

see my above post!!! wtf does this have to do with the troops????