new etpro beta discussion

christa · Post by **christa** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:25 pm

hiro wrote:how do you distinguish between single and double packs?

does it matter? Can you even distinguish that now?

El_Sexy · Post by **El_Sexy** » Tue Sep 28, 2004 10:58 pm

Yes you can...

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 12:06 am

/*Demoman*/ wrote:
hiro wrote:how do you distinguish between single and double packs?
how do you do it when the models are in 3d?

answer you cant until you pick them up

The colour is the key.

Let's wait for bani's release and see how he handled that in 2d.

Greets
Mark

meLonF · Post by **meLonF** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 12:26 am

christa wrote:
hiro wrote:how do you distinguish between single and double packs?
does it matter? Can you even distinguish that now?

Green = small
Grey = mega

or is your gamma too bright to tell the difference?

ItHiR · Post by **ItHiR** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 1:53 am

will be a static guid?

Neuro · Post by **Neuro** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 2:04 am

Will this hitbox thingie fix prone hitboxes ?

And i my be mistaken, but this sounds like another incerase of bandwidth requirement.

FraUz · Post by **FraUz** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 2:15 am

cg_autoaction bug preventing antilag/hitsound settings from being transmitted to server

I didn't know about this bug, is there anyone who can explain it exactly? thx

Kamel · Post by **Kamel** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 2:41 am

SWEET! wont be long now before my evil plans are complete; to make ET... wait for it... cell shaded! XIII HERE WE COME!

lol, only kidding. i am unsure what the advantage of seeing 2d models would be though.

Post by **bani** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 3:00 am

meLonF wrote:
bani wrote: <li>Zinx has made new headbox code which matches the clientside animations by modeling the player animations serverside <- needs heavy testing
this is great news! I was under the impression that this was something the etpro team was unable to fix. Wow. Once again the ETpro team has far exceeded what i thought was possible for ET. Great job guys

no, we just said it was hard. and it was. zinx put a lot of work into this.

meLonF · Post by **meLonF** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 3:44 am

bani wrote:no, we just said it was hard. and it was. zinx put a lot of work into this.

Well, i for one would like to say a massive thank you. This is one of the changes that i was really hoping could be implemented and i'm really looking forward to the results

So a huge thank you to zinc and the rest of the etpro team

(btw, my 'thank you' posts are starting to feel a bit inconsequential

*cough* setup an "ETpro development-costs" paypal account *cough*

)

D.Devil · Post by **D.Devil** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 3:48 am

nice job

Deus · Post by **Deus** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 4:07 am

FraUz wrote:cg_autoaction bug preventing antilag/hitsound settings from being transmitted to server

I didn't know about this bug, is there anyone who can explain it exactly? thx

when using cg_autoaction withbits 8 (for sw only) these settings mentioned above may become weird

*BiO*Tron · Post by *BiO*Tron » Wed Sep 29, 2004 4:45 am

Neuro wrote:Will this hitbox thingie fix prone hitboxes ?

I'd like to repeat this question since if the answer is 'yes', this fix will put a natural end to mid-duel proning.

Conzy · Post by **Conzy** » Wed Sep 29, 2004 5:47 am

If you need a tester for the hitbox, I'm here !!!

Q · Post by Q » Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:33 am

Afaict the hitbox was a bit lagging/dragging behind.

If you run backwards you see your own hitbox in front of you.
Maybe I don't understand the new hitboxes or some more development is needed.

How is the spawntimer working?
Counting downwards, or just saying the spawntime to the mates?
Syntax? 00:30 or 00/30...

I'm a noob I know,but I'm trying to learn =)

banimod / etpro / ettv forums

new etpro beta discussion

Re: Request for league admins: Beta test of next etpro

Re: Request for league admins: Beta test of next etpro