ET Pro 3.1.15 Public Beta Release

Official ET Pro announcements here...

Moderators: Forum moderators, developers

Locked
User avatar
bani
Site Admin
Posts: 2780
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2002 3:58 am
Contact:

ET Pro 3.1.15 Public Beta Release

Post by bani »

A public beta test of ET Pro 3.1.15 is now released.

This version is for ET 2.60 only!

Download and full information available here

Bug / cheat fixes:
referee password was case insensitive. fixed.

New features:
cvar backup files now include information about the server and the reason for the
cvar changes.

b_maxmortarpitch (default 0, disable)
Allows server to limit effective range of ground slope angles for mortar deployment.
If set to eg 20, then a mortar deployed on a slope greater than 20 degrees (eg 30 or
40) would behave as if it were deployed on a slope of 20 degrees.

b_chargetransfer (default 1, enable)
0 = disallow use of mines to transfer charge between players or 'store charge'
1 = default etmain behavior, allow charge transfer and storage

b_sv_hitsounds (default 1, enable)
0 = server globally disables hitsounds
1 = server allows clients to use hitsounds

b_fireteamLatchedClass (default 0, disable) - show latched playerclass in fireteam
0 = disabled, show ranks (default)
1 = enabled, show latched playerclass instead of rank

b_locationMaxChars now defaults to 25, and has ui menu to change it

b_locationJustify (default 0) - control justification of locations
-1 = left justify with padding
0 = left justify, no padding (default)
1 = right justify with padding

show_framecount (demo playback only)
0 = no framecounter
1 = show framecounter
2 = snapshot current frame number

exec_at_time (demo playback only)
Allows scripts to be executed exactly at a specified frame number.

Known bugs:
Last edited by bani on Wed May 25, 2005 10:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Deus
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 2:24 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Deus »

n1 work :)

poohunter.de:27972 up and running with
b_maxmortarpitch 20
b_chargetransfer 0

HF & GL
User avatar
ouroboro
Posts: 662
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 6:52 pm

Post by ouroboro »

very cool additions, thanks!
SickBoy
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 8:29 am

Post by SickBoy »

Some great new stuff, especially exec_at_time, really cool 8)
User avatar
gotenks
Posts: 3465
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:12 pm
Location: out of my mind
Contact:

Re: ET Pro 3.1.15 Public Beta Release

Post by gotenks »

bani wrote:b_chargetransfer (default 1, enable)
0 = disallow use of mines to transfer charge between players or 'store charge'
1 = default etmain behavior, allow charge transfer and storage
??? not sure what that means
My Website
Image
After a night of binge drinking:
=FF=im2good4u wrote:WTF wanst i on top ?
squadjot
Posts: 378
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2004 9:49 am
Location: Somewhere in Valby
Contact:

Post by squadjot »

SickBoy wrote:Some great new stuff, especially exec_at_time, really cool 8)
idd
User avatar
deej
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:44 am
Location: Belgium!
Contact:

Post by deej »

gotenks wrote:
bani wrote:b_chargetransfer (default 1, enable)
0 = disallow use of mines to transfer charge between players or 'store charge'
1 = default etmain behavior, allow charge transfer and storage
??? not sure what that means
If you throw a mine in a place where it can't be armed, then shoot your riflenade, try to arm the mine, you get extra charge back.

It was a trick seen in the match from J52 vs Parodia or Roistot and sparked alot of controversy. Clanbase ruled it wasn't a cheat.

This way of work does not work with dynamite by the way since the mine times out before you can throw the dyna.

Some heavy posts were made about it on xfire so I guess this is why ETPro team implemented it.

Anyway, R0F servers updated. GJ Bani & crew!
Our servers now run on 64 bit steroids. Point your ET to:
- Forgotten Ground StopWatch Server with occasional wolfrof 1
- Fraggle Rock ETPub Server - Mix up ET/UT & Duke Nukem
User avatar
dragon
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by dragon »

I assume this will happen in .15 caus it happened tonight with .14

The ol' rifle nade bug still exists - Unable to select the riflenade after spawning with the rifle. Only 1 eng on the team, no max rifles cvars implemented.

Name the information you require to assist with this :)
wipeout
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:12 am

Post by wipeout »

deej wrote:
gotenks wrote:
bani wrote:b_chargetransfer (default 1, enable)
0 = disallow use of mines to transfer charge between players or 'store charge'
1 = default etmain behavior, allow charge transfer and storage
??? not sure what that means
If you throw a mine in a place where it can't be armed, then shoot your riflenade, try to arm the mine, you get extra charge back.

It was a trick seen in the match from J52 vs Parodia or Roistot and sparked alot of controversy. Clanbase ruled it wasn't a cheat.

This way of work does not work with dynamite by the way since the mine times out before you can throw the dyna.

Some heavy posts were made about it on xfire so I guess this is why ETPro team implemented it.

Anyway, R0F servers updated. GJ Bani & crew!
No, actually this isn't about the game J52 vs Parodia.

U96d used it. It works like this:
Engi 1 has a rifle and shoots i.e. 2 times -> no charge left
Engi 2 has no rifle, full charge and throws 2 mines to a place where they can't be armed -> Engi 1 now tries to arm them and gets the charge for the mines back (not engi 2 got the charge, engi 1!) -> he's able to shoot again
So what happened was: the charge got transfered from one Eng to the other.
User avatar
deej
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:44 am
Location: Belgium!
Contact:

Post by deej »

wipeout wrote:No, actually this isn't about the game J52 vs Parodia.

U96d used it. It works like this:
Engi 1 has a rifle and shoots i.e. 2 times -> no charge left
Engi 2 has no rifle, full charge and throws 2 mines to a place where they can't be armed -> Engi 1 now tries to arm them and gets the charge for the mines back (not engi 2 got the charge, engi 1!) -> he's able to shoot again
So what happened was: the charge got transfered from one Eng to the other.
I stand corrected :oops:. Neat trick though.
Our servers now run on 64 bit steroids. Point your ET to:
- Forgotten Ground StopWatch Server with occasional wolfrof 1
- Fraggle Rock ETPub Server - Mix up ET/UT & Duke Nukem
SickBoy
Posts: 145
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 8:29 am

Post by SickBoy »

Why was this not considered as a bug ?
DG
Posts: 513
Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 4:16 am

Post by DG »

It's for both the (presumably related) bugs/features, if I interpret correctly.

Both occured in CB, the swapping was ruled as bug but they decided the store charge thing was ok, read the xfire posts if you want more info or to discuss it (its been done to death there).
User avatar
deej
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:44 am
Location: Belgium!
Contact:

Post by deej »

Our servers now run on 64 bit steroids. Point your ET to:
- Forgotten Ground StopWatch Server with occasional wolfrof 1
- Fraggle Rock ETPub Server - Mix up ET/UT & Duke Nukem
User avatar
ReyalP
Posts: 1663
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 11:44 am

Post by ReyalP »

There are two slightly different things related to charge transfer, the cvar deals with both.

1) transfer between players. Eng A drops a mine on an unplantable surface, eng B fires a r-nade and tries to arm the mine, and gets charge back. B gets charge from A. Clearly, this defeats the purpose of having an r-nade limit on the team.

This is defeated by making it so that if you didn't drop the mine, you cannot arm it on unarmable surfaces. You simply get a message 'landmine cannot be armed here' and the mine sits there. On armable surfaces, you can arm it as normal.

2) storing your own charge, to make the charge bar seem bigger. Eng drops a mine, and later fires an r-nade. He then tries to arm the mine, which gives him charge back instantly. Thus he can fire another r-nade sooner than he normally would.

This is defeated by making the amount of charge you get back from the mine 'decay' at the same rate your charge increases. So if you drop a mine, and arm it instantly, you get full charge back. If you wait for your charge bar to refill half of what you lost, you get half back. The decay is per mine, so if you leave multiple unarmed mines out, and try to arm them, you actually lose charge. If you stick to doing only one mine at a time, you never have a significant loss of charge.

* note that in all cases, the same thing should happen if the mine is on an armable surface, but your team is at its mine limit.
send lawyers, guns and money
*BUH*Hank
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 2:44 pm
Location: germany
Contact:

Post by *BUH*Hank »

I´ve update our server too ;) try it out, works fine at the moment
[BuH]ET1|FunForEveryone
IP: 62.4.74.241:27960 (40 Slots)
Locked