Page 1 of 2

New ET Patch from IDSOFTWARE

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 5:13 pm
by dragon
Not just ET, but RTCW and Quake 3 as well

Check the news at:

www.idsoftware.com

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 5:21 pm
by gotenks
allready got 2 posts about it, etpro and banimod don't work on it

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:21 pm
by dragon
Well, now the people that usually only read THIS forum, know about it :)

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 10:47 pm
by ReyalP
FWIW, servers should be able to update and work with the latest etpro (I only tested it very briefly, so there may be something I missed). If clients update, they will be kicked by etpro for integrity, regardless of which server version they connect to.

Updating servers is probably a good idea, since the directory traversal thing can have quite nasty consequences. The remapshader thing requires malicious serveradmins, which are a problem even without that exploit.

If you are using ETTV as your server executable, you may want to turn off sv_allowdownload. The patch readme suggests you can use www redirects with this off, but I'm pretty sure it disables both.

Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 4:12 am
by gotenks
dragon wrote:Well, now the people that usually only read THIS forum, know about it :)
http://bani.anime.net/banimod/forums/vi ... 2217#62217
this is on this forum too :P

Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:00 am
by RoadKillPuppy
reyalp wrote:The patch readme suggests you can use www redirects with this off, but I'm pretty sure it disables both.
You are correct....
But is the server still vulnerable with sv_allowdownload 1 and www redirects?

Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 3:02 pm
by ReyalP
RoadKillPuppy wrote:
reyalp wrote:The patch readme suggests you can use www redirects with this off, but I'm pretty sure it disables both.
You are correct....
But is the server still vulnerable with sv_allowdownload 1 and www redirects?
I would assume so, since clients who disable web downloads fall back to UDP.

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 4:03 am
by tuxwarrior
Hi,

are there any plans to release a new etpro for et-2.60b?
I ask because at least all gentoo-linux gamers are screwed now when they wanna play etpro as gentoo removed all et-versions prior to 2.60b from their package-repository.

Cheers
tuxwarrior

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 6:10 am
by fretn
yes, be patient please :)

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 5:16 pm
by tuxwarrior
Of course I'll be patient. I didn't wanna put any pressure on this. I just wanted to know if there is some update in work.
So thanks for your answer :)

Cheers
tuxwarrior

Posted: Sat May 13, 2006 10:35 pm
by arni
tuxwarrior wrote:Hi,

are there any plans to release a new etpro for et-2.60b?
I ask because at least all gentoo-linux gamers are screwed now when they wanna play etpro as gentoo removed all et-versions prior to 2.60b from their package-repository.

Cheers
tuxwarrior
is that "package" something like an rpm?

You can also install et the "ordinary" way or just copy over installations ...

Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 3:18 am
by tuxwarrior
Hello,
-=[VP]+arni+=- wrote:is that "package" something like an rpm?

You can also install et the "ordinary" way or just copy over installations ...
no, gentoo is a source based distribution which means normally every single package has to be compiled on the target machine (as long as the package is provided with sourcecode which can be compiled). Gentoo is using so called "ebuilds" for this which are some kind of bash-scripts that download, unpack, compile and install these packages. It's the same with et and etpro except for the compile-part which is not necessary for binary packages ;)

Of course I could rewrite the 2.60 ebuild or even install the old package without the use of gentoo's package-manager but I doubt many gentoo users would do any of these steps. And I for myself will wait (patiently of course ;)) with playing until the new etpro is out.

Cheers
tuxwarrior

Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 6:55 am
by zinx
It will be a few days until I get around to updating the required stuff. In the mean time, server adminstrators can use b_anticheat 0.

Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 11:35 pm
by deej
zinx wrote:server adminstrators can use b_anticheat 0.
Nah, then I'd rather stick with good old buggy 2.60 ;-). Besides, I'm waiting for ettv.x86.

Posted: Mon May 15, 2006 3:14 pm
by ReyalP
tuxwarrior wrote:Hello,
Of course I could rewrite the 2.60 ebuild or even install the old package without the use of gentoo's package-manager but I doubt many gentoo users would do any of these steps. And I for myself will wait (patiently of course ;)) with playing until the new etpro is out.

Cheers
tuxwarrior
Or you could just get the old et.x86 and run that when you want to play etpro.